Friday, July 10, 2009

Modern Quill

Modern Quill


30-Day LSAT Blog – Wrap-up

Posted: 10 Jul 2009 01:37 PM PDT

No Gravatar

After taking the June 2009 examination, and finally receiving my score, I’m ready to reflect on the LSAT experience and finish the TDLB. Here’s the punch line:

It worked.

I’m happy with my score. Any rational, sane person (yes, I’m looking at toplawschools.net here) ought to be. It was higher than almost all of the practice tests I blogged about, and I feel that it is an accurate representation of my LSAT-taking abilities, and I won’t be taking the exam again in September.

Here’s what I learned from the 30-day LSAT Blog, in no particular order.

  1. 30 days simply isn’t enough. That’s why every credible expert recommends six months. I had practiced for just under a year off-and-on again (mostly off).
  2. Do not take the LSAT in a foreign country. Taking my sweet time registering and winding up in Quebec didn’t help me, especially since my French is just good enough to ask for directions, not receive them.
  3. Get a good night’s sleep. The night before I was up until 1:00 am, had to wake up to make the 2 hour drive, and was sleeping on a pleather couch. It didn’t help.
  4. Bring a bigger snack. I brought three bananas, one of which I ate about 30 minutes before the exam to minimize hunger pangs. By the time I was taking the break, I would have strangled the nearest Canadian for a bar of chocolate.
  5. I cannot offer too much advice about how to prepare for Games. Thanks to the infamous Dinosaur game (which wasn’t the hardest game on the test, trust me) we saw a whole mass of candidates freaking out because their LGB method yielded a diagram that was, as a lawyer might say, as useless as a Swiss cheese tire.
  6. You will get discouraged. I figured I would hop into the room well-prepared, be relaxed before it began, and would blow through it . . . just like I did the PrepTests. By Section 4 I was doodling some arithmetic in the margin to guess which section was the experimental section.
  7. Don’t do what I just described.
  8. It will be impossible to focus. I studied in the library by putting my wristwatch on a table and glancing at it to see when time is up. What I should have done is hired a surly Russian prison guard to stand directly in front of my desk, circle around me slowly, and then scream at me when the section is over. I’m not saying that’s what my proctor did, but even if your proctor is Betty White that’s what it will feel like.
  9. Know your “rights.” Elle Sack has a very pronounced procedure for just about everything. Which is good because your proctor probably doesn’t care. I didn’t have any reason to invoke my LSAT “rights,” but I can only say that because I know what they are.
  10. Here is the most important advice I have. To prepare for the LSAT properly do six timed sections, because that’s how long the exam is. Obviously you should do the four PrepTest questions and an experimental section. But what about the sixth section?

Your first section should be completing an income tax return for a U.S. state determined at random.

You think I’m kidding. I’m only 25% kidding. Let’s say the ticket says you must report by 12:30. That means, if things go smoothly, you will begin your first section around 1:30. The administrative portion of the exam will take your bright-eyed, sharply-dressed well-prepared, clear-minded self, the self you prepared so hard to be, and completely ruin it. This is an awesome tactic on Elle Sack’s part because it makes certain your exam will go like this:

Ready for the LSAT!

Ready for the LSAT!

. . . at least until you get your groove back. Be wary! Be warned! But most of all, be prepared.

Wednesday, July 1, 2009

Modern Quill

Modern Quill


Selling Google

Posted: 01 Jul 2009 08:01 AM PDT

No Gravatar

Scott Moritz at theStreet.com wrote “Five Reasons to Sell Google.” Now, I’m not saying sell Google or buy Google. I don’t own any Google. But there was just something about the article’s logic that didn’t make sense to me:

The recession stalled the Internet search industry and handed Google its first ever sequential sales declinelast quarter. The cool-down ended a long, prosperous run for the search shop, and it may mark the end of the era of Google’s ever-expanding dominance.

That could be a problem, as any loss of sales is trouble for anyone (last time I checked). But the article seems to confuse “end of Google’s ever-expanding dominance” and “end of Google’s dominance.”

  • Search volume has slumped. For years, the number of searches has grown dramatically. Now, it’s flat.
  • New users are drying up. Now that everyone “Googles,” where are the new searchers coming from?
  • Market share is flat. Google has 65% of the search business, says comScore, but that hasn’t varied much in the past three quarters.
  • The recession has curbed international growth.
  • Ad pricing has stopped increasing.
  • So, are searches slumping or are searches flat? I can’t tell.

    If everyone Googles, Google doesn’t need to increase users. This is because Google is an advertising company. If an advertising company reaches “everyone,” it’s difficult to expect growth. This is like saying we should sell Luxury Brands because every woman age 13+ gets a Victoria Secret catalogue mailed to their house.

    I don’t doubt that market share is flat if you tell me that everyone already uses Google. But for more than 2 out of 3 searches, we use Google. This isn’t a battle of Coke v Pepsi. It’s more like Microsoft v. every *nix distro. Also note that this is market share, not searches. Now that US broadband adoption rate has trickled up to 63%, I presume Americans are searching more, and continue to search with Google as they do.

    The recession has curbed international grown: check. Doesn’t that sort of explain why a phenominal company could still experience all the above said?

    Search ads are a wonderful trick, but it’s still only one trick, and Google has not had any breakthrough success in other areas beyond search. YouTube, for example, continues to be a popular service and Google still hasn’t found a way to make money from it. By some estimates, Google loses between $200 million to $500 million a year on the video site.

    That’s not just one trick. It’s THE trick. This is like saying antenna television’s commercials are just one trick. Google had revenue of ~21.1 billion off of searches last year, with a revenue of 21.8 (according to Mortiz). The fact that Google gets dinged 2% of revenue for one of the Internet’s most popular websites doesn’t seem to leave anyone else awake at night.

    Surprisingly, Moritz discusses the measures that Yahoo (which Google bailed out) is taking that could possibly threaten Google. A new home page tailored to your interests. So, like iGoogle? There’s also some mention about Bing.com which has drawn “curious” searchers. Here’s the Thing with Bing: if you’re crossing over from Google, Bing looks like nothing but Google with a more cluttered screen. I only discovered the page preview on accident. I admit, there are some slick things about Bing—more than meet the eye. But I think Bing loses where Google has always won: the relevance battle. I ran three queries through each: “is racism illegal?” “places to eat lunch in montpelier vt” and “Jamie Gorton.” Bing won the first one, but only because it brought the only useful site (Wikipedia) up closer to the head of the page. Google easily won the other two.

    Le sigh. Finally the article dings efforts like Google Voice and Google Shows for not really taking off. But remember, Google is an advertizing company. I don’t know anyone who uses Google Chat. But I know that I can connect to my AIM account through Google Chat, and that means I’m not looking at the ads in the AOL client – I’m looking at the ads on Gmail.

    Aside from that, I have two theories about why Google has so many fingers in so many different ponds.

    • Familiarity with competitor’s technology. Remember Google Video? You used it if you had to, if YouTube didn’t have what you needed. And then Google buys YouTube. Huh. If Google gets to know the technology behind VoIP, and then one day Skype goes up for sale . . .
    • It costs their competitors money. Google Docs exists not because Writely was going to emerge as a major threat, but because it costs MSFT money. If you look at Google service X, and think, “Does this cost a competitor money?” then there’s the rationale. It inhibits someone else from taking that traffic away. Of course, there are no ads in Google Docs. There aren’t any ads on the editorial page of a newspaper either.

    Saturday, June 27, 2009

    Modern Quill

    Modern Quill


    Twitter Tracker

    Posted: 27 Jun 2009 08:18 AM PDT

    No Gravatar

    Conan O’Brian does a bit called Twitter Tracker. In a nutshell, he scans through celebrity twitters, finds the most asinine possible, and retweets them as absolutely mindblowing. You know, “meaty tweets.” “Bird bacon.”

    twittertracker

    I view this as something of a turning point. On the one hand, any new technology is going to be savagely parodied. Dane Cook was making references to Friendster all the way back when people thought Dane Cook was funny. On the other hand, we don’t usually see someone using that technology to facilitate. . .

    . . . I can’t even use the word “self-parody.” It’s more like “Dadaist exposé.” This is what we’ve signed up for. When Miley Cyrus wrote her sushi tweet, she sent it out to over one million twitter users. I’m going to assume that not even half of them were thrilled.

    Of course, this is just proof that Miley is “doing it wrong.” I’m convinced that the biggest mistake Twitter ever made was asking “What are you doing?” instead of “What are you thinking?” But no matter what it asks, it puts the creation of content into the hands of common people. And we love it. Community access television: no. Twitter Tracker: yes.

    Of course, not to pick on Miley, this can be ok. This can also be grating. Miley posted a tweet that read:
    chiefjoseph

    Of course, Miley forgot one very powerful word from that quotation. That’s the kind of thing that bugs me occasionally.

    Whenever I open up my Google RSS Reader, I’m greeted by the ever so familiar (1000+) tag. I have over one thousand unread RSS articles. Most of them come from Daring Fireball, Wired, and Macworld. Here’s a hint: when Apple releases a new iThing, each one of those websites will have at least one story on it. Wired is a really insightful read, but they post roughly one mole worth of new posts each day. I’ll probably keep Daring Fireball and scrap the other two.

    When Facebook came around, college freshman everywhere discovered that now the Internet was now simple enough that even your Mom can use it. Twitter is simple enough that now even your boss can use it. In fact, my boss just gave a presentation about Twitter to the division chiefs! She’s also smarter than the average bear by a long shot, but it’s still a long way from the old days of “Sue, how do I print my emails?” Those days were less than ten years ago.

    I don’t want to say that we’re at an upper limit of content saturation, because we’re not. However, we have wonderful systems in place for handling the content of data, almost all of which is ephemera. We just haven’t had the chance to keep up with it, management-wise. In a few years, I bet we’ll look back and think “I can’t believe we handled all that duplicity back then.” I cannot wait for better automatic threshing tools to help us separate the wheat from the chaff. The sweet tweets and the weak tweets, if you will.

    New friends

    Posted: 27 Jun 2009 07:12 AM PDT

    No Gravatar

    In a long-overdue website update, I added three wonderful blogs to the blogroll. I still hate that word. Kuz’s Tunes is from Andy Kuzmin, who moonlights working at Big Heavy World sorting through the Vermont music scene. Molly at the Loving Spoonful is just about to start her career as a 1L and is a generally interesting writer. Chere at Teasingly Diverse is first-class and thoroughly insightful. I had updated my Google Reader a while back, but not the blogroll.

    Dogfish Head Festina Pêche

    Posted: 26 Jun 2009 11:33 PM PDT

    No Gravatar

    Not too long ago I really railed against apricot beers. Dogfish Head’s Aprihop promised to be a better Magic Hat #9, but ultimately I was most impressed by Milly’s Tavern (Manchester NH) and their Bold Horizons: a raspberry Berlin Weissbier. So I was hanging around the beverage warehouse when I found a bottle of Dogfish Head Festina Pêche and I thought I had found it. After all, Dogfish Head crafts one of the most widely respected beers in America. With their creativity and resources, surely they could blow away a unique but mostly OK beer from a brewpub.

    And Beeradvocate would seem to agree with me, as the brew has a B overall and an A- from the Bros.

    I couldn’t handle it. The sour “notes” were so powerful that the peach was a lingering afterthought. I cried a little. The sour didn’t posses the yogurty slightly-sweet and super-clear sour I desired. If the beer tasted the way it smelled, I would have been delighted.

    Ultimately, the overwhelming sourness forced this one down the drain. Don’t get me wrong, I love all things sour. But what was supposed to go down smooth was really just undrinkable.

    Thankfully I had a Stone Brewing Arrogant Bastard Ale (Oaked) to help me forget the pain. What a shame, because I really like the 90 Minute IPA (as I am human) and Midas Touch.

    Friday, June 26, 2009

    Modern Quill

    Modern Quill


    The King is Dead

    Posted: 25 Jun 2009 10:00 PM PDT

    26jackson2

    The King of Pop is dead.

    Long live the Queen.

    MadThronePA

    But the crowning of the princess might be just around the corner . . .

    ladygaga

    In any event, in 7 years we’ll have forgotten the small children thing and the nose thing and the general creepiness that surrounded him. We’ll remember Billie Jean and Thriller. Life is short, art is long.

    Sunday, June 21, 2009

    Modern Quill

    Modern Quill


    New job jitters

    Posted: 20 Jun 2009 08:53 PM PDT

    No Gravatar

    Since I feel the urge to break the cardinal rule of the Internet and blog about my job, I feel compelled to share that I’m starting a new job on Monday.

    Last semester I did an academic internship with the Vermont Attorney General’s Civil Rights Unit. I loved it. The stories, the situations, and the plights were all very interesting, and I really appreciated the immense wordcraft that went into the job. I was sad to leave it at the end of the semester, because it was certainly the best academic experience of my semester. It made me feel a lot better about planning on assuming a titanic level of debt in order to go to law school.

    However, all my emphasis on the LSAT put a lot of doubt in my mind about whether or not it was worth it. A lawyer is one of only a few jobs that is impossible to understand what it’s like until you do it. When I first entered the workforce as a grocery bagger, it was exactly like what I expected it would be like. Anyone who would like to work in business would find it very easy to find an internship or job while in college that would give a fairly accurate vision of what business is like. But the law is a profession, lawyers are “officers of the court” and it would require a lot of learning just to examine what life as a lawyer is like.

    Eek.

    So, with all the stress with my LSAT, and as I saw a clearer picture of what I could expect for a score, I had to sober up and think to myself, “Is this worth it?” What sort of ROI can I expect from law school? At what point will I be able to pay off my loan, after three expensive years of deferring undergrad loans? I bookmarked NHTI’s paralegal program and felt nearly ill as I saw it would take 60 credits to get the certificate.

    Then, in the thick of it all, I received an email from the attorney who supervised my internship:

    It turns out the AG's office is in need of a phone person for remainder of June, July and August.  I didn't know if this is something that would be of interest to you – since you already had experience with referrals etc. . . . Housing can be arranged . . .

    I’m there. I’m so there.

    I’m going to be living out of a spare bedroom in this particular attorney’s house for the summer, which is only about 8 minutes away from the Pavilion (the AGO’s building). For free. That will be a different experience in-of-itself. My mother and partner are distraught, as am I, but life will go on. In my mind’s eye, I view this as sort of “St. Jerome in his Study” opportunity. Freelance writer and mercenary receptionist by day, quiet and dedicated writer and scholar by night, with the lights trimmed low.

    Of course, I just bought a new laptop and I’ll have fast enough wireless to play World of Warcraft, so goodness me. Oops, I just violated the second rule of the Internet: don’t mention that you play World of Warcraft: it makes you unemployable.

    However, I do plan on being back home for the weekends – that’s good, and I also plan on making bank by working 40-hour weeks and by finishing the contract work the AGO offered me in the spring. I also really want to make headway on my novel, whose MediaWiki experiment I shall continue to share in this space.

    What I really hope to get out of this experience, besides this so-called bank (which, at this point, is more debt-relief than anything) is a clearer insight into what I can expect in the legal field, and if I think it will all be worth law school. LSAT scores are supposed to be released within a fortnight, which will help me plan. But until then I need to enjoy the experience.

    Saturday, June 20, 2009

    Modern Quill

    Modern Quill


    Passwords

    Posted: 19 Jun 2009 06:11 PM PDT

    No Gravatar

    I got my new iPod Touch from Apple’s annual “Major in Mac” promotion. I’ve wanted an iPod Touch for a while for a simple reason: I don’t need a device that plays music (I have a real grown-up iPod) and I can’t afford an iPhone.

    As an aside, I think it’s insane that ATT prices the way they do. Price it to the teen market and collect. If memory serves me right, a 15-year-old was the winner of Apple’s 1,000,000,000th App promotion. That should be a red flag. But the monthly data plan is insane. Whenever I see someone I go to school with carrying an iPhone I want to steal it, because I know they aren’t paying for it and Mommy can afford to buy them another.

    In any event, it’s a real pain to type in your password on the Touch. That got me thinking: it’s time to organize and diversify my password collection.

    I think I’m better than most about passwords. None of my passwords are dictionary words or names. All include numbers, special characters, or both. My strongest passwords aren’t English.

    I’m no better than others in that, for all my logins, I only have only about 4 different passwords. Facebook, this blog, two of my emails, and my Twitter all use the same. Oh, and my credit card website, my iTunes account, my Amazon account . . . That’s not cool. That makes me one heck of a password tool. Of course, by the time you read this, that won’t be the case, obviously.

    So, here are some principles that I used when I was diversifying my passwords:

    • Follow established password guidelines: don’t use dictionary words, mix cases, use numbers and alt symbols, the longer the better.
    • Use passphrases, not passwords.
    • Make each memorable.
    • Associate passwords with sites. For instance, my password for Facebook could be FifthBusiness5%, and my password hint could be “Robertson Davies.”
    • I already have a bunch of pseduo-random numbers following me everywhere. Do you have a library card? Driver’s license number? Since I work in a grocery store, I always have my frequent shopper card on my person. (My frequent shopper card is different than yours, since my number isn’t linked to my name in “the system”).
    • There is a bunch on nonsense that I know I know: the number of stars in Super Mario 64, or the license plate of my first car.
    • Jeopardy it. If my password hint is “The Bluest Eye” my password could be “WhatwasZNHs1stnovel?”
    • Or not.
    • Prioritize. I want my bank passwords, my publishing sites (blog, Twitter, Facebook) and email to have very strong passwords. I don’t care if the world knows my password to Horoscopes.com is “Misscleo”.
    • Make them memorable, at least until muscle memory sets in.

    Sunday, June 14, 2009

    Modern Quill

    Modern Quill


    Warbreaker is out!

    Posted: 13 Jun 2009 09:56 PM PDT

    No Gravatar

    If you know me, you know I’m a huge Brandon Sanderson fan.

    Ok, if you know me, you probably don’t know that. I feel bad for anyone who tries to keep track of what books I read and my opinions of them. That’s why I don’t talk about books in the absence of the kind of implicit trust you’d need to hand someone your AmEx card. But the Internet is different so I get a white card for discussing it here:

    Mary: “Omg, did you read My Sister’s Keeper?”

    Jamie: There is no graceful way to extradite myself from this situation. “No, how was it?”

    Mary: “Oh, it’s really good. They’re making it into a movie.”

    Jamie: “Oh, cool.”

    Mary: “It has Alec Baldwin so you know it’s gonna be good. Why is your face all scrunchy?”

    Jamie: “It takes a lot of effort to not judge you.”
     


     

    In any event, I’m a huge Brandon Sanderson fan. I bought a hardcover copy of Elantris, which inexplicably vanished during a cleaning binge. I then bought a paperback Elantris and then a signed copy as a birthday present to myself. I own the Mistborn/Final Empire trilogy, including a signed third volume and a paperback third volume. I also own Warbreaker and now the only question is if I want to buy a numbered, signed copy. 

    I have never been disappointed with Brandon Sanderson. He’s the writer whose been unctioned to finish the Wheel of Time series. There is simply no analogy I can draw that captures the immense honor and Herculean difficulty of that task. It would be like being the painter to finish The Athenaeum, if The Athenaeum depicted the Last Supper instead of George Washington. And if it wasn’t painted by Stuart but by Michelangelo in fresco of a Frank Lloyd Wright building applianced by Faberge.

    So, in an effort to build up his reputation as a class-A writer, which he is, somehow he published Warbreaker while finishing A Memory of Light. Now he has two stand-alone epics and one epic trilogy, in addition to a children’s series. This is particularly interesting, since you can read a draft of Warbreaker for free, on Mr. Sanderson’s website.

    I could gush for a while, and discuss the absolute imperative of reading Elantris if you have ever, in your life, used your imagination. However, I just wanted to help spread the word, since I have a vested interest to make sure Mr. Sanderson keeps producing fantastic novels for me to read. When it’s over, which might take a long time, I’ll post a review of it here.

    If you’re in a hurry to read a review, check the reviews for Mr. Sanderson’s The Way of Kings. If I remember the story correctly, the publisher sent out some mixed signals about whether or not this book was in the pipeline, and Amazon picked it up. Some very devoted fans noticed and that’s the result.

    Wordpress 2.8

    Posted: 13 Jun 2009 07:49 PM PDT

    No Gravatar

    Amazingly, and against my every expectation, my upgrade from Wordpress 2.7.1 to Wordpress 2.8 went smoothly. My theme works, and my database is uncorrupted. I was a little suspicious because my WP instance has this . . . fun feature . . . where it can’t handle plugin upgrades automatically. Again, you wordpress.com users don’t know what you’re missing. However, things went swimingly. I can’t speak to the speed increases or super-widget handling yet, but I don’t distrust them.

    In other words, I became very frustrated when I learned MediaWiki’s extension for WYSIWYG editing is WYSIWYG in any color you like, so long as you like black.

    Right now, some wiki tweak is pulling his hair out and screaming “You’re doing it wrong!” Wiki software is supposed to represent the simplest database that can possibly work . . . ergo why we shouldn’t incorporate very useful features. (I’m making light of this. I know the dangers of code bloat and I don’t want Mediawiki to turn into, say, Microsoft Access. However no one was hurt by making something run more like HyperCard.)

    But darnitall, I’ve been using color to organize my writing notes since I got my first 64-pack of Crayolas. So I want it.

    I binged and tried to get twiki, fosswiki, and moinmoin running on my host. No luck. Each has a unique set of reasons why I’m not using it. Long story short: I could install Mediawiki. I’ll make do. So I’m stuck doing <span style:color=> for every little but I want to highlight. No, scratch that, Mediawiki only recogizes that syntax every other time (I don’t know why). So I’m using <font color=> instead. I don’t care if it’s deprecated, it’s just proof that the W3C needs more English majors.

    >> “Font is too vague. We’re going to mark it deprecated.”

    << “Um, what do I do if I want to change my font?”

    >> “Simple. Use spans, classes, divs, and cascading sheets.”

    But I march on with my experiment . . . maybe. There is one more option: using Wordpress itself with the Wordpress Wiki plugin. You wordpress.com users don’t know what you’re missing :-P

    But that’s a big maybe.